From Distress to Care
Michael Emenike Ode
Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State
Theophilus Chijioke Odeh
Australian College of Applied Psychology, Melbourne.
Priscilia Ogechukwu Odoh
Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State
PDF

Keywords

psychological help-seeking
mental health services
South-East Nigeria
pathways to care
culture and religion
ecological framework
global mental health

How to Cite

Ode, M., Odeh, T., & Odoh, P. (2026). From Distress to Care. Nigerian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2). Retrieved from https://nigerianjsp.com/index.php/NJSP/article/view/316
PDF

Abstract

Background: Large gaps between psychological distress and use of professional mental-health care persist in Nigeria, but conventional explanations often isolate stigma, literacy, beliefs, or service scarcity as separate barriers. Such accounts under-specify how distress is interpreted, negotiated within relationships, routed through plural care systems, and converted or not converted into actual service use. This conceptual paper develops the Contextual-Ecological Distress-to-Care (CEDC) Framework for South-East Nigeria. Approach: The framework was developed through a purposive, iterative conceptual synthesis of recent help-seeking theory, Nigerian and sub-Saharan African empirical evidence, and Nigerian mental-health policy and service literature, with foundational South-East Nigerian studies retained where uniquely informative. Framework: CEDC conceptualises help-seeking as a recursive six-stage pathway: distress emergence and recognition; explanatory appraisal and meaning-making; disclosure and relational negotiation; pathway selection and sequencing; conversion of intention into access; and engagement, continuation, switching, and re-entry. These stages are shaped simultaneously by individual, relational, religious-cultural, service, socioeconomic, digital-information, and policy environments. Professional psychological care is treated as one pathway within a plural ecology rather than an inevitable endpoint. Contribution: The framework integrates sociocultural meaning with material access, distinguishes intentions from realised service use, and models switching between professional, primary-care, faith-based, traditional, family/community, digital, and no-care pathways. It generates testable propositions and stage-specific intervention targets for counselling psychology, primary care, community partnerships, and mental-health policy. The framework requires prospective empirical validation across South-East Nigerian states and other pluralistic, resource-constrained settings.

PDF